0.04/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.04/0.12	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.12/0.32	% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
0.12/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.32	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.12/0.32	% WCLimit    : 180
0.12/0.32	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 08:45:54 EDT 2024
0.12/0.32	% CPUTime    : 
0.18/0.47	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.39/0.57	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p34zccXF2Z/E---3.1_15742.p
0.40/0.71	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.40/0.71	# Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLCHSA.
0.40/0.71	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.40/0.71	# Starting pre_casc_6 with 900s (5) cores
0.40/0.71	# Starting ehoh_best7 with 180s (1) cores
0.40/0.71	# Starting new_bool_8 with 180s (1) cores
0.40/0.71	# Starting new_ho_11 with 180s (1) cores
0.40/0.71	# new_bool_8 with pid 15823 completed with status 0
0.40/0.71	# Result found by new_bool_8
0.40/0.71	# Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLCHSA.
0.40/0.71	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.40/0.71	# Starting pre_casc_6 with 900s (5) cores
0.40/0.71	# Starting ehoh_best7 with 180s (1) cores
0.40/0.71	# Starting new_bool_8 with 180s (1) cores
0.40/0.71	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
0.40/0.71	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSFFFBN
0.40/0.71	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.40/0.71	# Starting sh3 with 98s (1) cores
0.40/0.71	# sh3 with pid 15825 completed with status 0
0.40/0.71	# Result found by sh3
0.40/0.71	# Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLCHSA.
0.40/0.71	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.40/0.71	# Starting pre_casc_6 with 900s (5) cores
0.40/0.71	# Starting ehoh_best7 with 180s (1) cores
0.40/0.71	# Starting new_bool_8 with 180s (1) cores
0.40/0.71	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
0.40/0.71	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSFFFBN
0.40/0.71	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.40/0.71	# Starting sh3 with 98s (1) cores
0.40/0.71	# Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
0.40/0.71	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.40/0.71	
0.40/0.71	# Proof found!
0.40/0.71	# SZS status Theorem
0.40/0.71	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.40/0.71	thf(decl_sort1, type, pname: $tType).
0.40/0.71	thf(decl_sort2, type, x_a: $tType).
0.40/0.71	thf(decl_57, type, ord_less_eq_a_o: (x_a > $o) > (x_a > $o) > $o).
0.40/0.71	thf(decl_89, type, image_pname_a: (pname > x_a) > (pname > $o) > x_a > $o).
0.40/0.71	thf(decl_101, type, insert_a: x_a > (x_a > $o) > x_a > $o).
0.40/0.71	thf(decl_102, type, insert_pname: pname > (pname > $o) > pname > $o).
0.40/0.71	thf(decl_114, type, member_pname: pname > (pname > $o) > $o).
0.40/0.71	thf(decl_116, type, g: x_a > $o).
0.40/0.71	thf(decl_118, type, u: pname > $o).
0.40/0.71	thf(decl_120, type, mgt_call: pname > x_a).
0.40/0.71	thf(decl_122, type, pn: pname).
0.40/0.71	thf(decl_160, type, esk33_0: x_a).
0.40/0.71	thf(conj_6, conjecture, (ord_less_eq_a_o @ (insert_a @ (mgt_call @ pn) @ g) @ (image_pname_a @ mgt_call @ u)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p34zccXF2Z/E---3.1_15742.p', conj_6)).
0.40/0.71	thf(conj_1, hypothesis, (ord_less_eq_a_o @ g @ (image_pname_a @ mgt_call @ u)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p34zccXF2Z/E---3.1_15742.p', conj_1)).
0.40/0.71	thf(fact_256_insert__code, axiom, ![X1221:x_a, X1222:x_a > $o, X1223:x_a]:((((X1222 @ X1223)|((X1221)=(X1223)))<=>(insert_a @ X1221 @ X1222 @ X1223))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p34zccXF2Z/E---3.1_15742.p', fact_256_insert__code)).
0.40/0.71	thf(fact_264_insert__absorb, axiom, ![X248:pname, X249:pname > $o]:(((member_pname @ X248 @ X249)=>((insert_pname @ X248 @ X249)=(X249)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p34zccXF2Z/E---3.1_15742.p', fact_264_insert__absorb)).
0.40/0.71	thf(fact_333_insert__mono, axiom, ![X356:x_a, X357:x_a > $o, X358:x_a > $o]:(((ord_less_eq_a_o @ X357 @ X358)=>(ord_less_eq_a_o @ (insert_a @ X356 @ X357) @ (insert_a @ X356 @ X358)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p34zccXF2Z/E---3.1_15742.p', fact_333_insert__mono)).
0.40/0.71	thf(fact_337_image__insert, axiom, ![X1098:pname > x_a, X1099:pname, X1100:pname > $o]:(((image_pname_a @ X1098 @ (insert_pname @ X1099 @ X1100))=(insert_a @ (X1098 @ X1099) @ (image_pname_a @ X1098 @ X1100)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p34zccXF2Z/E---3.1_15742.p', fact_337_image__insert)).
0.40/0.71	thf(conj_4, hypothesis, (member_pname @ pn @ u), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p34zccXF2Z/E---3.1_15742.p', conj_4)).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~(ord_less_eq_a_o @ (insert_a @ (mgt_call @ pn) @ g) @ (image_pname_a @ mgt_call @ u)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_6])])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ~(ord_less_eq_a_o @ (insert_a @ (mgt_call @ pn) @ g) @ (image_pname_a @ mgt_call @ u)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~((ord_less_eq_a_o @ (insert_a @ (mgt_call @ pn) @ g) @ (image_pname_a @ mgt_call @ u))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_10, hypothesis, (ord_less_eq_a_o @ g @ (image_pname_a @ mgt_call @ u)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_11, plain, ((insert_a @ (mgt_call @ pn) @ g)!=(g)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_12, plain, ((insert_a @ (mgt_call @ pn) @ g @ esk33_0)<~>(g @ esk33_0)), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X2370:x_a, X2371:x_a > $o, X2372:x_a]:((((~(X2371 @ X2372)|(insert_a @ X2370 @ X2371 @ X2372))&(((X2370)!=(X2372))|(insert_a @ X2370 @ X2371 @ X2372)))&(~(insert_a @ X2370 @ X2371 @ X2372)|((X2371 @ X2372)|((X2370)=(X2372)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_256_insert__code])])])])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_14, plain, (~((insert_a @ (mgt_call @ pn) @ g @ esk33_0))|~((g @ esk33_0))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X2:x_a > $o, X4:x_a, X3:x_a]:(((insert_a @ X4 @ X2 @ X3)|~((X2 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_16, plain, ((insert_a @ (mgt_call @ pn) @ g @ esk33_0)|(g @ esk33_0)), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_17, plain, ~((g @ esk33_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X2788:pname, X2789:pname > $o]:((~(member_pname @ X2788 @ X2789)|((insert_pname @ X2788 @ X2789)=(X2789)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_264_insert__absorb])])])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X2341:x_a, X2342:x_a > $o, X2343:x_a > $o]:((~(ord_less_eq_a_o @ X2342 @ X2343)|(ord_less_eq_a_o @ (insert_a @ X2341 @ X2342) @ (insert_a @ X2341 @ X2343)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_333_insert__mono])])])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X2:x_a > $o, X3:x_a, X4:x_a]:(((X2 @ X4)|((X3)=(X4))|~((insert_a @ X3 @ X2 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_21, plain, (insert_a @ (mgt_call @ pn) @ g @ esk33_0), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_22, plain, ![X2257:pname > x_a, X2258:pname, X2259:pname > $o]:(((image_pname_a @ X2257 @ (insert_pname @ X2258 @ X2259))=(insert_a @ (X2257 @ X2258) @ (image_pname_a @ X2257 @ X2259)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_337_image__insert])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_23, plain, ![X14:pname, X15:pname > $o]:((((insert_pname @ X14 @ X15)=(X15))|~((member_pname @ X14 @ X15)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_24, hypothesis, (member_pname @ pn @ u), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_4])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_25, plain, ![X2:x_a > $o, X3:x_a, X6:x_a > $o]:(((ord_less_eq_a_o @ (insert_a @ X3 @ X2) @ (insert_a @ X3 @ X6))|~((ord_less_eq_a_o @ X2 @ X6)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_26, plain, ((mgt_call @ pn)=(esk33_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21]), c_0_17])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_27, plain, ![X14:pname, X131:pname > x_a, X15:pname > $o]:(((image_pname_a @ X131 @ (insert_pname @ X14 @ X15))=(insert_a @ (X131 @ X14) @ (image_pname_a @ X131 @ X15)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_28, hypothesis, ((insert_pname @ pn @ u)=(u)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_29, plain, ![X2:x_a > $o]:((((image_pname_a @ mgt_call @ u)!=(insert_a @ esk33_0 @ X2))|~((ord_less_eq_a_o @ g @ X2)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_25]), c_0_26])])])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_30, hypothesis, ![X131:pname > x_a]:(((insert_a @ (X131 @ pn) @ (image_pname_a @ X131 @ u))=(image_pname_a @ X131 @ u))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_31, hypothesis, ((insert_a @ esk33_0 @ (image_pname_a @ mgt_call @ u))!=(image_pname_a @ mgt_call @ u)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_10])).
0.40/0.71	thf(c_0_32, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_26]), c_0_31]), ['proof']).
0.40/0.71	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.40/0.71	# Parsed axioms                        : 826
0.40/0.71	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 524
0.40/0.71	# Initial clauses                      : 431
0.40/0.71	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 30
0.40/0.71	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 401
0.40/0.71	# Processed clauses                    : 1145
0.40/0.71	# ...of these trivial                  : 16
0.40/0.71	# ...subsumed                          : 406
0.40/0.71	# ...remaining for further processing  : 723
0.40/0.71	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 191
0.40/0.71	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.40/0.71	# Backward-subsumed                    : 8
0.40/0.71	# Backward-rewritten                   : 7
0.40/0.71	# Generated clauses                    : 3799
0.40/0.71	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3229
0.40/0.71	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.40/0.71	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
0.40/0.71	# Paramodulations                      : 3333
0.40/0.71	# Factorizations                       : 4
0.40/0.71	# NegExts                              : 57
0.40/0.71	# Equation resolutions                 : 201
0.40/0.71	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.40/0.71	# Total rewrite steps                  : 989
0.40/0.71	# ...of those cached                   : 728
0.40/0.71	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.40/0.71	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.40/0.71	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.40/0.71	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.40/0.71	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.40/0.71	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.40/0.71	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.40/0.71	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.40/0.71	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.40/0.71	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.40/0.71	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.40/0.71	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.40/0.71	# Current number of processed clauses  : 377
0.40/0.71	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 71
0.40/0.71	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
0.40/0.71	#    Negative unit clauses             : 57
0.40/0.71	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 244
0.40/0.71	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2708
0.40/0.71	# ...number of literals in the above   : 6948
0.40/0.71	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.40/0.71	# Current number of archived clauses   : 285
0.40/0.71	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14303
0.40/0.71	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10541
0.40/0.71	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 149
0.40/0.71	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1635
0.40/0.71	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.40/0.71	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 87
0.40/0.71	# BW rewrite match successes           : 49
0.40/0.71	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.40/0.71	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.40/0.71	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 74414
0.40/0.71	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 13075
0.40/0.71	
0.40/0.71	# -------------------------------------------------
0.40/0.71	# User time                : 0.099 s
0.40/0.71	# System time              : 0.012 s
0.40/0.71	# Total time               : 0.111 s
0.40/0.71	# Maximum resident set size: 4992 pages
0.40/0.71	
0.40/0.71	# -------------------------------------------------
0.40/0.71	# User time                : 0.117 s
0.40/0.71	# System time              : 0.014 s
0.40/0.71	# Total time               : 0.131 s
0.40/0.71	# Maximum resident set size: 3516 pages
0.40/0.71	% E---3.1 exiting
0.40/0.71	% E exiting
0.40/0.71	EOF